What exactly did Pashinyan and Aliyev agreed on, if there is a dispute even over the terminology?

After my post published yesterday morning, Pashinyan finally responded to Aliyev, who once again used the expression "Zangezur corridor," this time from the UN podium: "This expression is absent from the documents agreed upon in Washington, as well as in the Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations. I think it makes sense that my Azerbaijani colleague clarifies what he means by using this expression, as in the Armenian reality, it is perceived as a territorial claim against Armenia and is associated with conflict rhetoric," stated the Prime Minister of Armenia while addressing the 80th session of the UN General Assembly.

What exactly did Pashinyan and Aliyev agreed on, if there is a dispute even over the terminology?
Of course, there will be disputes over the substance as well, because, in Aliyev's understanding, he received a corridor, but what Pashinyan implies is clear to no one. And all these disagreements are being presented and sold to our people as a "victory" and "established peace."

In short: Pashinyan, from the UN podium, essentially stated that there is no consensus on the agreements reached between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Now, since Armenia has not received security guarantees and has not demanded the creation of mechanisms for ensuring security and resolving disputes, and a fundamental problem actually exists, Pashinyan is obligated to call US President Donald Trump. It seems this was the only way announced to solve the problems.

Someone recently boasted that they have Trump's WhatsApp number.

So call him...

Call him directly via WhatsApp!